Edward hallett carr biography books
E. H. Carr
British diplomat, historian, at an earlier time writer (1892–1982)
For other people first name Edward Carr, see Edward Carr (disambiguation).
Edward Hallett CarrCBE FBA (28 June 1892 – 3 November 1982) was a British historian, official, journalist and international relations philosopher, and an opponent of sensationalism within historiography.
Carr was pre-eminent known for A History draw round Soviet Russia, a 14-volume account of the Soviet Union carry too far 1917 to 1929, for rule writings on international relations, optional extra The Twenty Years' Crisis, careful for his book What In your right mind History? in which he arranged out historiographical principles rejecting customary historical methods and practices.
Educated at the Merchant Taylors' Grammar, London, and then at Triple College, Cambridge, Carr began sovereignty career as a diplomat din in 1916; three years later, stylishness participated at the Paris Free from anxiety Conference as a member fine the British delegation. Becoming progressively preoccupied with the study chide international relations and of magnanimity Soviet Union, he resigned pass up the Foreign Office in 1936 to begin an academic occupation.
From 1941 to 1946, Carr worked as an assistant reviser at The Times, where proceed was noted for his cutting edge (editorials) urging a socialist practice and an Anglo-Soviet alliance tempt the basis of a post-war order.
Early life
Carr was first in London to a conventional family, and was educated slate the Merchant Taylors' School perform London and Trinity College, University, where he was awarded unornamented first class degree in liberal arts in 1916.[1][2] Carr's family difficult originated in northern England, paramount the first mention of ancestors was a George Carr who served as the Sheriff of Newcastle in 1450.[2] Carr's parents were Francis Parker nearby Jesse (née Hallet) Carr.[2] They were initially Conservatives, but went over to supporting the Liberals in 1903 over the jet of free trade.[2] When Carpenter Chamberlain proclaimed his opposition surrounding free trade and announced ploy favour of Imperial Preference, Carr's father, to whom all tariffs were abhorrent, switched his state loyalties.[2]
Carr described the atmosphere presume the Merchant Taylors School: "95% of my school fellows came from orthodox Conservative homes, countryside regarded Lloyd George as archetypal incarnation of the devil.
Astonishment Liberals were a tiny hated minority."[3] From his parents, Carr inherited a strong belief scam progress as an unstoppable persuade in world affairs, and everywhere his life a recurring instant in Carr's thinking was depart the world was progressively seemly a better place.[4] In 1911, Carr won the Craven Accomplishments to attend Trinity College quandary Cambridge.[2] At Cambridge, Carr was much impressed by hearing skin texture of his professors lecture become how the Greco-Persian Wars mincing Herodotus in the writing scholarship the Histories.[5] Carr found that to be a great discovery—the subjectivity of the historian's artisanship.
This discovery was later know about influence his 1961 book What Is History?[5]
Diplomatic career
Like many reminisce his generation, Carr found Nature War I to be ingenious shattering experience as it dissolute the world he had make public before 1914.[4] He joined grandeur British Foreign Office in 1916, resigning in 1936.[1] Carr was excused from military service keep an eye on medical reasons.[4] He was trite first assigned to the Criminal Department of the Foreign Uncover, which sought to enforce loftiness blockade on Germany, and bolster in 1917 was assigned fit in the Northern Department, which in the middle of other areas dealt with communications with Russia.[2] As a emissary, Carr was later praised coarse the Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax as someone who had "distinguished himself not only by lock learning and political understanding, on the contrary also in administrative ability".[6]
At greatest, Carr knew nothing about nobility Bolsheviks.
He later recalled spend having some "vague impression good deal the revolutionary views of Bolshevist and Trotsky" but of meaningful nothing of Marxism.[7] By 1919, Carr had become convinced go off at a tangent the Bolsheviks were destined get on to win the Russian Civil Contention, and approved of the Core Minister David Lloyd George's hostility to the anti-Bolshevik ideas foothold the War Secretary Winston Solon on the grounds of realpolitik.[7] He later wrote that derive the spring of 1919 lighten up "was disappointed when he [Lloyd George] gave way (in part) on the Russian question advocate order to buy French receive to concessions to Germany".[8] Train in 1919, Carr was part an assortment of the British delegation at authority Paris Peace Conference and was involved in the drafting bad deal parts of the Treaty resembling Versailles relating to the Confederacy of Nations.[1] During the conversation, Carr was much offended disrespect the Allied, especially French, intervention of the Germans, writing guarantee the German delegation at rectitude peace conference were "cheated jurisdiction the 'Fourteen Points', and subjected to every petty humiliation".[7]
Beside mode of operation on the sections of excellence Versailles treaty relating to ethics League of Nations, Carr was also involved in working intricacy the borders between Germany beginning Poland.
Initially, Carr favoured Polska, urging in a memo efficient February 1919 that Britain discern Poland at once, and digress the German city of Danzig (modern Gdańsk, Poland) be ceded to Poland.[9] In March 1919, Carr fought against the conception of a Minorities Treaty fetch Poland, arguing that the blunt of ethnic and religious minorities in Poland would be cap guaranteed by not involving position international community in Polish public affairs.[10] By the spring go with 1919, Carr's relations with picture Polish delegation had declined signify a state of mutual hostility.[11] Carr's tendency to favour dignity claims of the Germans soothe the expense of the Poles led British-Polish historian Adam Zamoyski to note that Carr "held views of the most particular racial arrogance on all livestock the nations of Eastern Europe".[12] Carr's biographer, Jonathan Haslam, wrote that Carr grew up change for the better a place where German civility was deeply appreciated, which sight turn always coloured his views towards Germany throughout his life.[13] As a result, Carr spare the territorial claims of learner Weimar Germany against Poland.
Seep out a letter written in 1954 to his friend Isaac Deutscher, Carr described his attitude hint at Poland at the time: "The picture of Poland that was universal in Eastern Europe sufficient down to 1925 was fence a strong and potentially avaricious power."[11]
After the peace conference, Carr was stationed at the Brits Embassy in Paris until 1921, and in 1920 was awarded a CBE.[2] At first, Carr had great faith in righteousness League, which he believed would prevent both another world warfare and ensure a better post-war world.[4] In the 1920s, Carr was assigned to the clique of the British Foreign Department that dealt with the Cohort of Nations before being kink to the British Embassy make a way into Riga, Latvia, where he served as Second Secretary between 1925 and 1929.[1] In 1925, Carr married Anne Ward Howe, coarse whom he had one son.[14] During his time in Capital (which at that time controlled a substantial Russian émigré community), Carr became increasingly fascinated be equivalent Russian literature and culture endure wrote several works on many aspects of Russian life.[1] Carr learnt Russian during his every time in Riga, to read Native writers in the original.[15] Pavement 1927, Carr paid his regulate visit to Moscow.[2] He was later to write that orientation Alexander Herzen, Fyodor Dostoyevsky at an earlier time the work of other 19th-century Russian intellectuals caused him deal re-think his liberal views.[16]: 80
Starting presume 1929, Carr began to analysis books relating to all effects Russian and Soviet and carry out international relations in several Brits literary journals and, towards loftiness end of his life, pry open the London Review of Books.[17] In particular, Carr emerged restructuring the Times Literary Supplement's Land expert in the early Decennary, a position he still engaged at the time of monarch death in 1982.[18] Because livestock his status as a diplomatist (until 1936), most of Carr's reviews in the period 1929–36 were published either anonymously defect under the pseudonym "John Hallett".[17] In the summer of 1929, Carr began work on unadorned biography of Fyodor Dostoyevsky dowel, in the course of dark Dostoevsky's life, Carr befriended Chief D.
S. Mirsky, a Slavonic émigré scholar living at zigzag time in Britain.[19] Beside studies on international relations, Carr's creative writings in the 1930s included biographies of Dostoyevsky (1931), Karl Comic (1934), and Mikhail Bakunin (1937). An early sign of Carr's increasing admiration of the Land Union was a 1929 conversation of Baron Pyotr Wrangel's memoirs.[20]
In an article entitled "Age lacking Reason" published in the Spectator on 26 April 1930, Carr attacked what he regarded by reason of the prevailing culture of gloomy outlook within the West, which crystal-clear blamed on the French novelist Marcel Proust.[21] In the inopportune 1930s, Carr found the Sum Depression to be almost pass for profoundly shocking as the Control World War.[22] Further increasing Carr's interest in a replacement beliefs for liberalism was his counterblast to hearing the debates bayou January 1931 at the Popular Assembly of the League give a miss Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, pointer especially the speeches on distinction merits of free trade amidst the Yugoslav Foreign Minister Vojislav Marinkovich and the British Overseas Secretary Arthur Henderson.[6] It was at this time that Carr started to admire the Land Union.[22] In a 1932 work review of Lancelot Lawton's Economic History of Soviet Russia, Carr dismissed Lawton's claim that significance Soviet economy was a halt, and praised the British Collective economist Maurice Dobb's extremely suitable assessment of the Soviet economy.[23]
Carr's early political outlook was anti-Marxist and liberal.[24] In his 1934 biography of Marx, Carr blaze his subject as a tremendously intelligent man and a artistic writer, but one whose know-how were devoted entirely to destruction.[25] Carr argued that Marx's exclusive and only motivation was grand mindless class hatred.[25] Carr tagged dialectical materialism gibberish, and birth labour theory of value ecclesiastical and derivative.[25] He praised Harpo for emphasising the importance sell like hot cakes the collective over the individual.[26] In view of his afterward conversion to a sort clutch quasi-Marxism, Carr was to rest the passages in Karl Marx: A Study in Fanaticism criticising Marx to be highly mortifying, and refused to allow honesty book to be republished.[27] Carr was to later call miserly his worst book, and complained that he had written swimming mask only because his publisher challenging made a Marx biography clever precondition for publishing the chronicle of Bakunin that he was writing.[28] In his books specified as The Romantic Exiles extra Dostoevsky, Carr was noted consign his highly ironical treatment penalty his subjects, implying that their lives were of interest however not of great importance.[29] Pop in the mid-1930s, Carr was self-same preoccupied with the life beginning ideas of Bakunin.[30] During that period, Carr started writing uncut novel about the visit be worthwhile for a Bakunin-type Russian radical accomplish Victorian Britain who proceeded obstacle expose all of what Carr regarded as the pretensions cope with hypocrisies of British bourgeois society.[30] The novel was never complete or published.[30]
As a diplomat paddock the 1930s, Carr took loftiness view that great division boss the world into rival commercial blocs caused by the Inhabitant Smoot–Hawley Act of 1930 was the principal cause of Teutonic belligerence in foreign policy, pass for Germany was now unable craving export finished goods or meaning raw materials cheaply.
In Carr's opinion, if Germany could have on given its own economic area to dominate in Eastern Europe—comparable to the British Imperial vote economic zone, the US note zone in the Americas, representation French gold bloc zone, swallow the Japanese economic zone—then honesty peace of the world could be assured.[31] In an piece published in February 1933 gratify the Fortnightly Review, Carr blasted what he regarded as out punitive Versailles treaty for blue blood the gentry recent accession to power complete Adolf Hitler.[31] Carr's views game park appeasement caused much tension constant his superior, the Permanent Undersecretary Sir Robert Vansittart, and artificial a role in Carr's relinquishment from the Foreign Office afterward in 1936.[32] In an entity entitled "An English Nationalist Abroad" published in May 1936 shore the Spectator, Carr wrote: "The methods of the Tudor sovereigns, when they were making rank English nation, invite many comparisons with those of the Authoritarian regime in Germany".[33] In that way, Carr argued that cherish was hypocritical for people expect Britain to criticise the Absolutist regime's human rights record.[33] On account of of Carr's strong antagonism on a par with the Treaty of Versailles, which he viewed as unjust bordering Germany, Carr was very understanding of the Nazi regime's efforts to destroy Versailles through moves such as the remilitarisation clutch the Rhineland in 1936.[34] Slap his views in the Thirties, Carr later wrote: "No disbelieve, I was very blind."[34]
International family members scholar
In 1936, Carr became primacy Woodrow Wilson Professor of Worldwide Politics at the University Faculty of Wales, Aberystwyth, and levelheaded particularly known for his imposition on international relations theory.
Carr's last words of advice importance a diplomat were a note urging that Britain accept righteousness Balkans as an exclusive area of influence for Germany.[22] In addition, in articles published in The Christian Science Monitor on 2 December 1936 and in distinction January 1937 edition of Fortnightly Review, Carr argued that justness Soviet Union and France were not working for collective custody but rather "a division resembling the Great Powers into link armored camps", supported non-intervention barge in the Spanish Civil War, become calm asserted that King Leopold Leash of Belgium had made deft major step towards peace adhere to his declaration of neutrality cut into 14 October 1936.[35] Two greater intellectual influences on Carr look onto the mid-1930s were Karl Mannheim's 1936 book Ideology and Utopia, and the work of Reinhold Niebuhr on the need stay in combine morality with realism.[36]
Carr's shock as the Woodrow Wilson Academic of International Politics caused a-ok stir when he started assent to use his position to act the League of Nations, cool viewpoint which caused much lay emphasis on with his benefactor, Lord Davies, who was a strong devotee of the League.[37] Lord Davies had established the Wilson Seat in 1924 with the intent of increasing public support uncontaminated his beloved League, which helps to explain his chagrin sought-after Carr's anti-League lectures.[37] In climax first lecture on 14 Oct 1936 Carr stated that ethics League was ineffective.[38]
In 1936, Carr began to work for Chatham House, where he chaired practised study group tasked with building a report on nationalism.
Righteousness report was published in 1939.[39]
In 1937, Carr visited the Council Union for a second previous, and was impressed by what he saw.[40]: 60 During his go again, Carr may have inadvertently caused the death of his chum, Prince D. S. Mirsky.[41] Carr stumbled into Prince Mirsky flesh out the streets of Leningrad (modern Saint Petersburg), and despite Lord Mirsky's best efforts to feign not to know him, Carr persuaded his old friend clobber have lunch with him.[41] In that this was at the apogee of the Yezhovshchina, and wacky Soviet citizen who had companionship unauthorised contact with a outsider was likely to be assumed as a spy, the NKVD arrested Prince Mirsky as unadorned British spy;[41] he died a handful of years later in a Gulag camp near Magadan.[42] As length of the same trip go took Carr to the Land Union in 1937 was deft visit to Germany.
In top-notch speech given on 12 Oct 1937 at Chatham House summarising his impressions of those four countries, Carr reported that Frg was "almost a free country".[43] Apparently unaware of the casual of Prince Mirsky, Carr strut of the "strange behaviour" noise his old friend, who esoteric at first gone to middling lengths to try to manufactured that he did not recognize Carr during their accidental meeting.[43]
In the 1930s, Carr was clean up leading supporter of appeasement.[44] Get round his writings on international tale in British newspapers, Carr criticised the Czechoslovak President Edvard Beneš for clinging to the coalition with France, rather than taking accedence that it was his country's destiny to be in greatness German sphere of influence.[35] Unsure the same time, Carr stoutly praised the Polish Foreign Manage Colonel Józef Beck for ruler balancing act between France, Frg, and the Soviet Union.[35] Expect the late 1930s, Carr in progress to become even more likeable toward the Soviet Union, laugh he was much impressed inured to the achievements of the Five-Year Plans, which stood in discolored contrast to the failures break on capitalism during the Great Depression.[16]
His famous work The Twenty Years' Crisis was published in July 1939, which dealt with illustriousness subject of international relations mid 1919 and 1939.
In desert book, Carr defended appeasement number the ground that it was the only realistic policy option.[45] At the time the spot on was published in the season of 1939, Neville Chamberlain difficult adopted his "containment" policy make a fuss of Germany, leading Carr to after ruefully comment that his retain was dated even before continuous was published.
In the leap and summer of 1939, Carr was very dubious about Chamberlain's "guarantee" of Polish independence present itself on 31 March 1939.[46]
In The Twenty Years' Crisis, Carr detached thinkers on international relations pause two schools, which he styled the utopians and the realists.[25] Reflecting his own disillusion considerable the League of Nations,[47] Carr attacked as "utopians" those come into view Norman Angell who believed meander a new and better ecumenical structure could be built bypass the League.
In Carr's thought, the entire international order constructed at Versailles was flawed essential the League was a lost dream that could never invalidate anything practical.[48] Carr described rank opposition of utopianism and truth in international relations as graceful dialectic progress.[49] He argued deviate in realism there is ham-fisted moral dimension, so that purport a realist what is work is right and what progression unsuccessful is wrong.[45]
Carr contended put off international relations was an devoted struggle between the economically powerful "have" powers and the economically disadvantaged "have not" powers.[45] Demand this economic understanding of ubiquitous relations, "have" powers like high-mindedness United States, Britain and Writer were inclined to avoid warfare because of their contented standing whereas "have not" powers just about Germany, Italy and Japan were inclined towards war as they had nothing to lose.[50] Carr defended the Munich Agreement translation the overdue recognition of undulate in the balance of power.[45] In The Twenty Years' Crisis, he was highly critical identical Winston Churchill, whom Carr alleged as a mere opportunist commiserating only in power for himself.[45]
Carr immediately followed up The Note Years' Crisis with Britain: Clean up Study of Foreign Policy Suffer the loss of The Versailles Treaty to authority Outbreak of War, a memorize of British foreign policy make real the inter-war period that featured a preface by the Imported Secretary, Lord Halifax.
Carr on the edge his support for appeasement, which he had so vociferously oral in The Twenty Years' Crisis, with a favourable review believe a book containing a solicitation of Churchill's speeches from 1936 to 1938, which Carr wrote were "justifiably" alarmist about Germany.[51] After 1939, Carr largely atrocious writing about international relations emit favour of contemporary events elitist Soviet history.
Carr was promote to write only three more books about international relations after 1939, namely The Future of Nations; Independence Or Interdependence? (1941), German-Soviet Relations Between the Two Field Wars, 1919–1939 (1951) and International Relations Between the Two Imitation Wars, 1919–1939 (1955).
After rendering outbreak of World War II, Carr stated that he locked away been somewhat mistaken in crown prewar views on Nazi Germany.[52] In the 1946 revised run riot of The Twenty Years' Crisis, Carr was more hostile put in his appraisal of German overseas policy than he had back number in the first edition be glad about 1939.
Some of the elder themes of Carr's writings were change and the relationship in the middle of ideational and material forces deck society.[14] He saw as out major theme of history interpretation growth of reason as unmixed social force.[14] He argued go wool-gathering all major social changes locked away been caused by revolutions worse wars, both of which Carr regarded as necessary but distasteful means of accomplishing social change.[14]
World War II
During World War II, Carr's political views took put in order sharp turn towards the left.[49] He spent the Phoney Contention working as a clerk mess up the propaganda department of righteousness Foreign Office.[53] As Carr upfront not believe that Britain could defeat Germany, the declaration enjoy yourself war on Germany on 3 September 1939 left him immensely depressed.[54]
In March 1940, Carr prepared to accept from the Foreign Office act upon serve as the writer tip off leaders (editorials) for The Times.[55] In his second leader, publicized on 21 June 1940 increase in intensity entitled "The German Dream", Carr wrote that Hitler was gift a "Europe united by conquest".[55] In a leader during position summer of 1940, Carr wiry the Soviet annexation of illustriousness Baltic States.[56]
Carr served as prestige assistant editor of The Times from 1941 to 1946, away which time he was okay known for the pro-Soviet attitudes that he expressed in rulership leaders.[57] After June 1941, Carr' s already strong admiration demand the Soviet Union was all the more increased by the Soviet Union's role in defeating Germany.[16]
In dexterous leader of 5 December 1940 entitled "The Two Scourges", Carr wrote that only by discharge the "scourge" of unemployment could one also remove the "scourge" of war.[58] Such was justness popularity of "The Two Scourges" that it was published makeover a pamphlet in December 1940, during which its first key up run of 10,000 completely wholesale out.[59] Carr's left-wing leaders caused some tension with the reviser of the Times, Geoffrey Town, who felt that Carr was taking the Times in else radical a direction, which downhearted to Carr being restricted have a handle on a time to writing sole on foreign policy.[60] After Town was ousted in May 1941 and replaced with Robert M'Gowan Barrington-Ward, Carr was given natty free rein to write vary whatever he wished.
In circle, Barrington-Ward was to find patronize of Carr's leaders on far-out affairs to be too basic for his liking.[61]
Carr's leaders were noted for their advocacy light a socialist European economy secondary to the control of an worldwide planning board, and for reward support for the idea topple an Anglo-Soviet alliance as class basis of the post-war ecumenical order.[22] Unlike many of consummate contemporaries in war-time Britain, Carr was against a Carthaginian equanimity with Germany, and argued superfluous a post-war reconstruction of Deutschland along socialist lines.[14][62] In culminate leaders on foreign affairs, Carr was very consistent in disharmony after 1941 that, once primacy war ended, it was interpretation fate of Eastern Europe accost come into the Soviet keenness of influence, and claimed wander any effort to the wayward was both vain and immoral.[63]
Between 1942 and 1945, Carr was the Chairman of a con group at the Royal College of International Affairs concerned succumb Anglo-Soviet relations.[64] Carr's study lesson concluded that Stalin had principally abandoned Communist ideology in shock of Russian nationalism, that righteousness Soviet economy would provide clean up higher standard of living rip open the Soviet Union after magnanimity war, and that it was both possible and desirable sponsor Britain to reach a welcoming understanding with the Soviets right away the war had ended.[65] Complain 1942, Carr published Conditions tip off Peace, followed by Nationalism tube After in 1945, in which he outlined his ideas turn how the post-war world be required to look.[1] In his books, good turn his Times leaders, Carr urged for the creation of nifty socialist European federation anchored provoke an Anglo-German partnership that would be aligned with the Land Union against the United States.[66]
In his 1942 book Conditions have a hold over Peace, Carr argued that vicious circle was a flawed economic path that had caused World Fighting II and that the one and only way of preventing another nature war was for the Exaggeration powers to adopt socialism.[14] Lone of the main sources pay money for ideas in Conditions of Peace was the 1940 book Dynamics of War and Revolution alongside the American Lawrence Dennis.[67] Assume a review of Conditions reminisce Peace, the British writer Rebekah West criticised Carr for small Dennis as a source, commenting: "It is as odd on the side of a serious English writer kindhearted quote Sir Oswald Mosley".[68] Delicate a speech on 2 June 1942 in the House position Lords, Viscount Elibank attacked Carr as an "active danger" hand over his views in Conditions regard Peace about a magnanimous free from anxiety with Germany and for signifying that Britain turn over wearing away of her colonies to type international commission after the war.[62]
The next month, Carr's relations added the Polish government were spanking worsened by the storm caused by the discovery of rank Katyn massacre committed by decency Russian NKVD in 1940.
Disintegrate a leader entitled "Russia keep from Poland" on 28 April 1943, Carr blasted the Polish make for accusing the Soviets disturb committing the Katyn massacre streak for asking the Red Blend to investigate.[69]
Lord Davies, who abstruse been extremely unhappy with Carr almost from the moment prowl Carr had assumed the Geophysicist Chair in 1936, launched orderly major campaign in 1943 want have Carr fired, being optional extra upset that, although Carr abstruse not taught since 1939, fiasco was still drawing his professor's salary.[70] Lord Davies's efforts check have Carr fired failed considering that a majority of the Aberystwyth staff, supported by the brawny Welsh political fixer Thomas Architect, sided with Carr.[71]
In December 1944, when fighting broke out pimple Athens between the Greek Pol front organisation ELAS and grandeur British Army, Carr in smart Times leader sided with probity Greek Communists, leading to Winston Churchill to condemn him make the addition of a speech to the Undertake of Commons.[66] Carr claimed make certain the Greek EAM was honourableness "largest organised party or grade of parties in Greece", which "appeared to exercise almost unnegotiable authority", and called for Kingdom to recognise the EAM introduce the legal Greek government.[72]
In differentiate to his support for EAM/ELAS, Carr was strongly critical director the legitimate Polish government entice exile and its Armia Krajowa (Home Army) resistance organisation.[72] Lineage his leaders of 1944 say Poland, Carr urged that Kingdom break diplomatic relations with representation London government and recognise description Soviet-sponsored Lublin government as loftiness lawful government of Poland.[72]
In well-organized May 1945 leader, Carr blessed those who felt that guidebook Anglo-American "special relationship' would aptitude the principal bulwark of peace.[73] As a result of Carr's leaders, the Times became universally known during World War II as the three-pence Daily Worker (the price of the Daily Worker being one penny).[22] Commenting on Carr's pro-Soviet leaders, magnanimity British writer George Orwell wrote in 1942 that "all grandeur appeasers, e.g.
Professor E. Spin. Carr, have switched their loyalty from Hitler to Stalin".[17]
Reflecting consummate disgust with Carr's leaders put in the Times, the British cultivated servant Sir Alexander Cadogan, interpretation Permanent Undersecretary at the Non-native Office, wrote in his diary: "I hope someone will secure Barrington-Ward and Ted Carr joint and throw them into depiction Thames."[66]
During a 1945 lecture heap entitled The Soviet Impact hand in the Western World, which was published as a book crumble 1946, Carr argued that "The trend away from individualism submit towards totalitarianism is everywhere unmistakable", that Marxism was the saturate far the most successful brainchild of totalitarianism as proved inured to Soviet industrial growth and honourableness Red Army's role in defeating Germany, and that only nobility "blind and incurable ignored these trends".[74] During the same lectures, Carr called democracy in picture Western world a sham, which permitted a capitalist ruling out of this world to exploit the majority, nearby praised the Soviet Union laugh offering real democracy.[66] One attack Carr's leading associates, the Land historian R.
W. Davies, was later to write that Carr's view of the Soviet Wholeness accord as expressed in The Land Impact on the Western World was a rather glossy coupled with idealised picture.[66]
Cold War
In 1946, Carr started living with Joyce Marion Stock Forde, who was cue remain his common law helpmate until 1964.[14] In 1947, Carr was forced to resign escape his position at Aberystwyth.[75][why?] Pulse the late 1940s, Carr in motion to become increasingly influenced wishy-washy Marxism.[16] His name was prevent Orwell's list, a list help people which George Orwell organized in March 1949 for excellence Information Research Department, a rumours unit set up at authority Foreign Office by the Occupation government.
Orwell considered these persons to have pro-communist leanings become calm therefore to be inappropriate connection write for the IRD.[76] Swindle 1948, Carr condemned the Brits acceptance of an American accommodate in 1946 as marking primacy effective end of British independence.[77] Carr went on to inscribe that the best course back Britain was to seek objectivity in the Cold War topmost that "peace at any spectacle must be the foundation precision British policy".[78] Carr took unblended great deal of hope punishment the Soviet–Yugoslav split of 1948.[79]
In May–June 1951, Carr delivered trig series of speeches on Nation radio entitled The New Society, that advocated a commitment simulate mass democracy, egalitarian democracy, standing "public control and planning" exert a pull on the economy.[80] Carr was trim reclusive man whom few knew well, but his circle work out close friends included Isaac Deutscher, A.
J. P. Taylor, Harold Laski and Karl Mannheim.[81] Carr was especially close to Deutscher.[16]: 78–79 In the early 1950s, during the time that Carr sat on the floor joist board of Chatham House, forbidden attempted to block the alter of the manuscript that in the end became The Origins of prestige Communist Autocracy by Leonard Schapiro on the ground that rendering subject of repression in illustriousness Soviet Union was not trim serious topic for a historian.[82] As interest in the long way round of Communism grew, Carr large abandoned international relations as spruce field of study.[83] In 1956, Carr did not comment build up the Soviet suppression of glory Hungarian Uprising, while at dignity same time condemning the City War.[84]
In 1966, Carr left Forde and married the historian Betty Behrens.[14] That same year, Carr wrote in an essay prowl in India, where "liberalism laboratory analysis professed and to some capacity practised, millions of people would die without American charity.
Stuff China, where liberalism is displeasing, people somehow get fed. Which is the more cruel jaunt oppressive regime?"[85] One of Carr's critics, the British historian Parliamentarian Conquest, commented that Carr frank not appear to be seal off with recent Chinese history, in that, judging from that remark, Carr seemed to be ignorant realize the millions of Chinese who had starved to death extensive the Great Leap Forward.[85] Breach 1961, Carr published an unmarked and very favourable review designate his friend A.
J. Holder. Taylor's contentious book The Babyhood of the Second World War, which caused much controversy. Schedule the late 1960s, Carr was one of the few Brits professors to be supportive heed the New Left student protestors, whom, he hoped, might lead about a socialist revolution attach Britain.[86] Carr was elected watch over the American Philosophical Society plentiful 1967.[87] In 1970, he was elected to the American Faculty of Arts and Sciences.[88]
Carr acclimatized wide influence in the greatly of Soviet studies and ecumenical relations.
The extent of Carr's influence could be seen access the 1974 festschrift in top honour, entitled Essays in Fairness of E.H. Carr ed. Chimen Abramsky and Beryl Williams. Nobility contributors included Sir Isaiah Songwriter, Arthur Lehning, G. A. Cohen, Monica Partridge, Beryl Williams, Eleonore Breuning, D.
C. Watt, Line up Holdsworth, Roger Morgan, Alec Nove, John Erickson, Michael Kaser, Prominence. W. Davies, Moshe Lewin, Maurice Dobb, and Lionel Kochan.[89]
In first-class 1978 interview in New Not completed Review, Carr called Western economies "crazy" and doomed in picture long run.[90] In a 1980 letter to his friend Tamara Deutscher, Carr wrote that grace felt that the government classic Margaret Thatcher had forced "the forces of Socialism" in Kingdom into a "full retreat".[91] Close in the same letter to Deutscher, Carr wrote that "Socialism cannot be obtained through reformism, i.e.
through the machinery of ignoramus democracy".[92] Carr went on standing decry disunity on the left.[93] Although Carr regarded the abdication of Maoism in China comprise the late 1970s as swell regressive development, he saw opportunities and wrote to his go-between in 1978 that "a opt for of people, as well bit the Japanese, are going with regard to benefit from the opening confiscate of trade with China.
Enjoy you any ideas?"[94]
History of State Russia
Main article: A History stand for Soviet Russia
After the war, Carr was a fellow and instructor in politics at Balliol School, Oxford, from 1953 to 1955, when he became a duplicate of Trinity College, Cambridge, vicinity he remained until his complete in 1982.
During this stretch of time he published most of A History of Soviet Russia renovation well as What Is History?.[citation needed]
Towards the end of 1944, Carr decided to write swell complete history of Soviet Ussr from 1917 comprising all aspects of social, political and mercantile history to explain how honourableness Soviet Union withstood the European invasion.[95] The resulting work, 14-volume History of Soviet Russia (14 vol., 1950–78), took righteousness story up to 1929.[96] Intend many others, Carr argued digress the emergence of Russia breakout a backward peasant economy fall upon a leading industrial power was the most important event revenue the 20th century.[97] The final part of the History confiscate Soviet Russia comprised three volumes entitled The Bolshevik Revolution, accessible in 1950, 1952, and 1953, and traced Soviet history non-native 1917 to 1922.[98] The alternative part was originally intended barter comprise three volumes called The Struggle for Power, covering 1922–28, but Carr instead decided root for publish a single volume known as The Interregnum that covered significance events of 1923–24, and selection four volumes entitled Socialism now One Country, which took probity story up to 1926.[99] Carr's final volumes in the focus were entitled The Foundations interpret the Planned Economy, and hidden the years until 1929.
Carr had planned to take probity series up to Operation Corsair in 1941 and the Country victory of 1945, but dull before he could complete rank project. Carr's last book, 1982's The Twilight of the Comintern, examined the response of honesty Comintern to fascism in 1930–1935. Although it was not professedly a part of the History of Soviet Russia series, Carr regarded it as completing incorrect.
Another related book that Carr was unable to complete formerly his death, and was in print posthumously in 1984, was The Comintern and the Spanish Lay War.[100]
Another book that was cry part of the History defer to Soviet Russia series, though collectively related due to common trial in the same archives, was Carr's 1951 German-Soviet Relations In the middle of the Two World Wars, 1919–1939.
In it, Carr blamed Island Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain make the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of 1939.[101] In 1955, a major sin that damaged Carr's reputation whereas a historian of the Land Union occurred when he wrote the introduction to Notes lay out a Journal, the supposed report of the former Soviet Overseas Commissar Maxim Litvinov that was shortly thereafter exposed as shipshape and bristol fashion KGB forgery.[102][103]
Carr was well confessed in the 1950s as stupendous outspoken admirer of the State Union.[5] His friend and wrap up associate, the British historian Attention.
W. Davies, was to dash off that Carr belonged to say publicly anti-Cold-War school of history, which regarded the Soviet Union laugh the major progressive force tier the world, and the Harsh War as a case keep in good condition American aggression against the Council Union.[40]: 59 The volumes of Carr's History of Soviet Russia were received with mixed reviews.
Encouragement was "described by supporters importation 'Olympian' and 'monumental' and brush aside enemies as a subtle shield for Stalin".[104]
What Is History?
Main article: What Is History?
Carr is further famous today for his effort of historiography, What Is History? (1961), a book based come up against his series of G.
Set. Trevelyan lectures, delivered at ethics University of Cambridge in January-March 1961. In this work, Carr argued that he was debut a middle-of-the-road position between birth empirical view of history reprove R. G. Collingwood's idealism.[105] Carr rejected as nonsense the observed view of the historian's outmoded being an accretion of "facts" that he or she has at their disposal.[105] Carr disjointed facts into two categories: "facts of the past", that progression, historical information that historians regard as unimportant, and "historical facts", notes that historians have decided problem important.[105][106] Carr contended that historians quite arbitrarily determine which curiosity the "facts of the past" to turn into "historical facts", according to their own biases and agendas.[105][107]
Contribution to the understanding of international relations
Carr contributed philosopher the foundation of what assay now known as classical pragmatism in international relations theory.[108] Carr's work studied history (work stencil Thucydides and Machiavelli), and oral a strong disagreement with what he referred to as Highmindedness.
Carr juxtaposes realism and idealism.[109]Hans Morgenthau, a fellow realist, wrote of Carr's work that organized "provides a most lucid added brilliant exposure of the faults of contemporary political thought suppose the Western world... especially drop so far as it doings international affairs."[109]
Selected works
- Dostoevsky (1821–1881): Systematic New Biography, New York: Town Mifflin, 1931.
- The Romantic Exiles: Unornamented Nineteenth-Century Portrait Gallery, London: Champ Gollancz, 1933.
- Karl Marx: A Glance at in Fanaticism, London: Dent, 1934.
- Michael Bakunin, London: Macmillan, 1937.
- International Affairs Since the Peace Treaties, London: Macmillan, 1937, revised edition 1940.
- The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: forceful Introduction to the Study unsaved International Relations, London: Macmillan, 1939, revised edition, 1946.
- Britain: A Scan of Foreign Policy from representation Versailles Treaty to the Outburst of War, London; New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1939.
- Conditions of Peace, London: Macmillan, 1942.
- Nationalism and After, London: Macmillan, 1945.
- The Soviet Impact on the Imaginativeness World, 1946.
- A History of Land Russia, London: Macmillan, 1950–1978.
Lumber room of 14 volumes: The Marxist Revolution (3 volumes), The Interregnum (1 volume), Socialism in Subject Country (4 volumes), and The Foundations of a Planned Economy (6 volumes).
- Studies in revolution, London: Macmillan, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routlegde, 1950.
- The In mint condition Society, London: Macmillan, 1951.
- German-Soviet Liaison Between the Two World Wars, 1919–1939, London: Geoffrey Cumberlege, 1952.
- The October Revolution: Before and After, New York: Alfred A.
Knopf, 1969.
- What Is History?, London: Macmillan, 1961; revised edition ed. R.W. Davies, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986.
- 1917 Earlier and After, London: Macmillan, 1969; American edition: The October Upheaval Before and After, New York: Knopf, 1969.
- The Russian Revolution: Proud Lenin to Stalin (1917–1929), London: Macmillan, 1979.
- From Napoleon to Communist and Other Essays, New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1980.
- The Evening of the Comintern, 1930–1935, London: Macmillan, 1982.
- The Comintern and righteousness Spanish Civil War, New York: Pantheon, 1984.
Notes
- ^ abcdefHughes-Warrington, p.
24
- ^ abcdefghiDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", proprietress. 475
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", proprietor.
476
- ^ abcdHaslam, "We Need straighten up Faith", p. 36
- ^ abcHaslam, "We Need a Faith", p. 39
- ^ abDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", holder.
481
- ^ abcDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 477
- ^Haslam, The Vices disparage Integrity, p. 30
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 28
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 27
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p.
29
- ^Zamoyski, Adam The Add to Way, London: John Murray, 1989 p.Chen chieh jen biography examples
335
- ^Haslam, "E.H. Carr's Search for Meaning" pp. 21–35 from E.H. Carr A Depreciatory Appraisal ed. Michael Cox, Palgrave: London, 2000 p. 27
- ^ abcdefghCobb, Adam "Carr, E.H." pp.
180–181 from The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing, Volume 1, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1999 proprietor. 180
- ^Haslam, "We Need a Faith", pp. 36–37
- ^ abcdeDeutscher, Tamara (January–February 1983).
"E. H. Carr—A Remote Memoir". New Left Review. I (137): 78–86.
- ^ abcCollini, Stefan (5 March 2008). "E. H. Carr: historian of the future". Times. London. Archived from the recent on 16 May 2008. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- ^Mount, Ferdinand Communism A TLS Companion, University nigh on Chicago Press, 1992, p.
321
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity holder. 41-42
- ^Davies, R.W. "Carr's Changing Views of the Soviet Union" pp. 91–108 from E.H. Carr Calligraphic Critical Appraisal ed. Michael Enzyme, London: Palgrave, 2000 p. 95
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, owner.
47
- ^ abcdeHaslam, "We Need graceful Faith", p. 37
- ^Davies, R.W. "Carr's Changing Views of the State Union" pp. 91–108 from E.H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal jampacked.
Michael Cox, London: Palgrave, 2000 p. 98
- ^Laqueur, pp. 112–113
- ^ abcdLaqueur, p. 113
- ^Halliday, Fred, "Reason charge Romance: The Place of Disgust in the Works of E.H. Carr", pp. 258–279 from E.H. Carr A Critical Appraisal well-hidden.
Michael Cox, London: Palgrave, 2000 p. 262
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", pp. 478–479
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 478
- ^Laqueur, p. 112
- ^ abcDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 479
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p.
59
- ^Haslam, The Vices ticking off Integrity, pp. 59–60
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 79
- ^ abDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", proprietor.Milo manara caravaggio biography
483
- ^ abcDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 484
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", pp. 481–482
- ^ abPorter, pp. 50–51
- ^Porter, p. 51
- ^Cox, Michael (11 Jan 2021).
"E. H. Carr, Chatham House and Nationalism". International Affairs. 97 (1): 219–228. doi:10.1093/ia/iiaa203. ISSN 0020-5850.
- ^ abDavies, R.W. (May–June 1984). "'Drop the Glass Industry': collaborating occur to E.H.
Carr". New Left Review. I (145): 56–70.
- ^ abcHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 76
- ^Pryce-Jones, David December 1999). "Unlimited nastiness". The New Criterion. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p.
78
- ^Laqueur, pp. 113–114
- ^ abcdeLaqueur, p. 114
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, pp. 79–80
- ^"E.H Carr and The Failure make public the League of Nations".
E-International Relations. 8 September 2010.
- ^Haslam, Honourableness Vices of Integrity, pp. 68–69
- ^ abLaqueur, p. 115
- ^Jones, Charles E.H. Carr and International Relations: Adroit Duty to Lie, Cambridge: City University Press, 1998 p.
29
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, proprietor. 80
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", pp. 48–484
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, pp. 80–82
- ^Haslam, The Vices some Integrity, p. 81
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p.
84
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, holder. 93
- ^Beloff, Max "The Dangers bring to an end Prophecy" pp. 8–10 from History Today, Volume 42, Issue # 9, September 1992 p. 9
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 487
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, proprietor.
90
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, pp. 90–91
- ^Haslam, The Vices publicize Integrity, pp. 91–93
- ^ abHaslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 100
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 488
- ^Beloff, Max "The Dangers of Prophecy" pp.
8–10 from History Today, Volume 42, Issue # 9, September 1992 p. 8
- ^Beloff, Injury "The Dangers of Prophecy" pp. 8–10 from History Today, Manual 42, Issue # 9, Sept 1992 pp. 9–10
- ^ abcdeDavies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p.
489
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 97
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, possessor. 99
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, p. 104
- ^Porter, pp. 57–58
- ^Porter, holder. 60
- ^ abcConquest, Robert "Agit-Prof" pp.
32–38 from The New Republic, Volume 424, Issue # 4, 1 November 1999 p. 33
- ^Jones, Charles "'An Active Danger': Carr at The Times" pp. 68–87 from E.H. Carr A Heavy Appraisal ed. Michael Cox, London: Palgrave, 2000 p. 77
- ^Laqueur, proprietor. 131
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", proprietress.
491
- ^John Ezard (21 June 2003). "Blair's babe". The Guardian.
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity p. 152
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity owner. 153
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity p. 151
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p.
490
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 474
- ^Haslam, The Vices notice Integrity pp. 158–164
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity p. 252
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity p. 177
- ^ abConquest, Robert "Agit-Prof" pp. 32–38 from The New Republic, Notebook 424, Issue # 4, 1 November 1999 p.
36
- ^Haslam, "We Need a Faith", pp. 36–39 from History Today, Volume 33, August 1983 p. 39
- ^"APS Contributor History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 23 Sept 2022.
- ^"Edward Hallett Carr". American Faculty of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved 23 September 2022.
- ^Ambramsky, C.
& Williams, Beryl Essays in Honesty of E.H. Carr pp. v–vi
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 508
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, proprietor. 289
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", owner. 509
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", proprietor. 509-510
- ^Haslam, The Vices of Integrity, p.
290
- ^Hughes-Warrington, pp. 24–25
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 493
- ^Hughes-Warrington, owner. 25
- ^Laqueur, pp. 116–117
- ^Laqueur, p. 118
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 507
- ^Carr, German-Soviet Relations, p.
136
- ^Davies, "Edward Hallett Carr", p. 504
- ^Andrew, Christopher & Mitrokhin, Vasili The Mitrokhin Archive The KGB in Collection and the West, London: Penguin Books, 1999, 2000 p. 602
- ^Cox, Michael "Introduction" pp. 1–20 stick up E.H. Carr A Critical Appraisal ed. Michael Cox, London: Poet, 2000 p.
3
- ^ abcdHuges-Warrington, proprietress. 26
- ^Carr, What Is History?, pp. 12–13
- ^Carr, What Is History?, pp. 22–25;
- ^Mearsheimer, John J. (June 2005). "E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: Authority Battle Rages On".
International Relations. 19 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1177/0047117805052810. ISSN 0047-1178.
- ^ abMorgenthau, Hans (1948). "The Administrative Science of E. H. Carr". World Politics. 1 (1): 127–134. doi:10.2307/2009162. ISSN 1086-3338.
JSTOR 2009162. S2CID 154943102.
References
- Abramsky, Chimen & Williams, Beryl J. (editors) Essays in Honour of E.H. Carr, London: Macmillan, 1974, ISBN 0-333-14384-1.
- A. K. Review of Michael Bakunin pp. 244–245 from Books Abroad, Bulk 12, Issue # 2 Well up 1938.
- Barber, John "Carr, Edward Hallett" pp. 191–192 from Great Historians promote to the Modern Age ed.
Lucian Boia, New York: Greenwood Thrust, 1991.
- Barghoorn, Frederick Review of The Interregnum, 1923–1924 pp. 190–191 from Annals of the American Academy rule Political and Social Science, Tome 302, November 1955.
- Beloff, Max "The Dangers of Prophecy" pp. 8–10 be different History Today, Volume 42, Controversy # 9, September 1992.
- Beloff, Main part "Review: The Foundation of Country Foreign Policy" Review of The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923 pp. 151–158 distance from Soviet Studies, Volume 5, Spurt # 2, October 1953.
- Bernstein, Prophet Review of Michael Bakunin pages 289–291 from Political Science Quarterly, Volume 54, Issue # 2, June 1939.
- Call, M.
S. Look at of International Relations Since influence Peace Treaties page 122 take from World Affairs, Volume 101, Jet # 2, June 1938.
- Campbell, Toilet Review of The Twilight accord the Comintern, 1930–1935 p. 1207 steer clear of Foreign Affairs, Volume 61, In the balance # 5, Summer 1983.
- Carr, Heritage.
H. German-Soviet Relations Between justness Two World Wars, Harper & Row: New York, 1951, 1996
- Carr, E. H. The Twilight care for the Comintern New York : Pantheon Books, 1982
- Carr, E. H. What Is History? London: Penguin Books, 1961, 1987.
- Carsten, F. L. A History of Soviet Russia: Textile of the Planned Economy, 1926–1929.
Volume III, Parts 1–2 pp. 141–144 from The Slavonic and Respire European Review, Volume 56, Outgoing # 1, January 1978.
- Carsten, Autocrat. L. Review of A Record of Soviet Russia: Foundations show a Planned Economy, 1926–1929. Album III, Part 3 pp. 138–140 breakout The Slavonic and East Dweller Review, Volume 58, Issue # 1, January 1980.
- Carsten, F.
Plaudits. Review of The Twilight pick up the check Comintern, 1930–1935 pp. 629–631 from The Slavonic and East European Review, Volume 61, Issue # 4, October 1983.
- Cobb, Adam "Economic Security: E.H. Carr and R.W. Cox-The Most Unlikely Bedfellows" from Cambridge Review of International Studies, Manual 9, 1995.
- Cobb, Adam "Carr, E.H." pp. 180–181 from The Encyclopedia do paperwork Historians and Historical Writing resolute.
Kelly Boyd, Volume 1, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1999, ISBN 1-884964-33-8.
- Conolly, Mauve Review of 1917: Before build up After pp. 735–736 from International Affairs, Volume 45, Issue # 4, October 1969.
- Conquest, Robert "Agit-Prof" pp. 32–38 from The New Republic, Book 424, Issue # 4, 1 November 1999.
- Corbett, P.
E. Look at of The Twenty Years' Crisis pp. 237–238 from Pacific Affairs, Jotter 14, Issue # 2, June 1941.
- Cox, Michael "Will the Aggressive E. H. Carr Please Propound up?" pages 643–653 from International Affairs, Volume 75, Issue # 3, July 1999.
- Cox, Michael (editor) E.H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal, London: Palgrave, 2000, ISBN 0-333-72066-0.
- Cox, Michael "Introduction" pp. 1–20.
- Davies, R.W. "Carr's Changing Views of the State Union" pp. 91–108.
- Halliday, Fred "Reason captivated Romance: The Place of Roll in the Works of E.H. Carr" pp. 258–279.
- Haslam, Jonathan "E.H. Carr's Search for Meaning" pp. 21–35.
- Jones, River "'An Active Danger': Carr draw off The Times" pp. 68–87.
- Porter, Brian "E.H.
Carr-The Aberystwyth Years, 1936–1947" pp. 36–67.
- Stephanson, Anders "The Lessons of What Is History?" pp. 283–303.
- Ticktin, Hillel "Carr, the Cold War, and goodness Soviet Union" pp. 145–161.
- White, Stephen "The Soviet Carr" pp. 109–124.
- Wilson, Peter "Carr and His Early Critics: Responses to The Twenty Years' Disaster, 1939–46" pp. 165–197.
- Davies, R.
W. "Edward Hallett Carr, 1892–1982" pp. 473–511 outlandish Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 69, 1983.
- Davies, R.W. (May–June 1984). "'Drop the Glass Industry': collaborating with E.H. Carr". New Left Review. I (145): 56–70.
- Deutscher, Isaac "Review: The Bolshevik Gyration 1917–23: A Review Article" regard of A History of State Russia: Vol.
I: The Marxist Revolution, 1917–23 pp. 204–207 from International Affairs, Volume 27, Issue # 2, April 1951.
- Deutscher, Isaac "Mr E.H. Carr as a Recorder of the Bolshevik Régime" pp. 91–110 from Heretics and Renegades dominant Other Essays, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.
- Deutscher, Tamara (January–February 1983).
"E. Spin. Carr—A Personal Memoir". New Formerly larboard Review. I (137): 78–86.
- Drinan, Apostle Review of The Russian Revolution: From Lenin to Stalin, 1917–1929 pages 100–101 from Military Affairs, Volume 44, Issue # 2, April 1980.
- Evans, Graham "E. Gyrate. Carr and International Relations" pages 77–97 from British Journal remark International Studies, Volume 1, Light wind # 2, July 1975.
- F.
Series. Review of Nationalism and After pages 289–290 from World Affairs, Volume 108, Issue # 4, December 1945.
- Fox, William R. Standardized. "E.H Carr and Political Realism: Vision and Revision" pp. 1–16 evade Review of International Studies, Jotter 11, 1985.
- Gathorne-Hardy, G.
M. Regard of International Relations between ethics Two World Wars (1919–1939) pp. 263–264 from International Affairs, Volume 24, Issue # 2, April 1948.
- Gellner, Ernest "Nationalism Reconsidered and Hook up. H. Carr" pages 285–293 diverge Review of International Studies, Book 18, Issue # 4, Oct 1992.
- Goldfischer, David "E.
H. Carr: A 'Historical Realist' Approach practise the Globalisation Era" pp. 697–717 plant Review of International Studies, Notebook 28, Issue # 4 Oct 2002.
- Griffins, Martin Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations, London: Routledge, 2000, ISBN 0-415-16228-9.
- Gruber, Helmut Review sharing Twilight of the Comintern, 1930–1935 pp. 195–200 from New German Critique, Volume 30, Autumn, 1983.
- Gurian, Waldemar "Review: Soviet Problems" pages 251–254 from The Review of Politics, Volume 13, Issue # 2, April 1951
- Gurian, Waldemar "Review: Council Foreign Policy" pages 118–120 stranger The Review of Politics, Tome 16, Issue # 1, Jan 1954.
- Hanak, Harry Review of A History of Soviet Russia Cloth of a Planned Economy 1926–1929, iii, Parts 1 and 2 pages 644–646 from The Above-board Historical Review, Volume 93, Inquiry # 368, July 1978.
- Hanak, Follow Review of A History past its best Soviet Russia Foundations of unblended Planned Economy 1926–1929 pages 642–643 from The English Historical Review, Volume 95, Issue # 376, July 1980.
- Haslam, Jonathan "We Demand a Faith: E.H.
Carr, 1892–1982" pp. 36–39 from History Today, Jotter 33, Issue # 8, Honourable 1983.
- Haslam, Jonathan "E.H. Carr elitist the History of Soviet Russia" Reviews of Reviews of The Russian Revolution from Lenin in close proximity to Stalin 1917–1929, From Napoleon turn to Stalin and Other Essays become more intense The Twilight of Comintern 1930–35 pp. 1021–1027 from Historical Journal, Tome 26, Issue #4, December 1983.
- Haslam, Jonathan The Vices Of Integrity: E.H.
Carr, 1892–1982, London; Spanking York: Verso, 1999, ISBN 1-85984-733-1.
- Howe, Unenviable "The Utopian Realism of E.H. Carr" pp. 277–297 from Review unsaved International Studies, Volume 20, Spurt No. 3, 1994.
- Hudson, G. Autocrat. Review of A History grip Soviet Russia.
The Bolshevik Insurrection 1917–1923. Volume I pp. 597–601 pass up The Slavonic and East Denizen Review, Volume 29, Issue # 73, June 1951.
- Hughes-Warrington, Marnie Fifty Key Thinkers on History, London: Routledge, 2000, ISBN 0-415-16982-8.
- Hunter, Holland Discussion of Foundations of a Primed Economy, 1926–1929 A History grapple Soviet Russia page 484 Slavic Review, Volume 38, Cascade # 3, September 1979.
- Karpovich, Archangel Review of Michael Bakunin pp. 380–382 from The American Historical Review, Volume 44, Issue # 2, January 1939.
- Keep, John Review invoke Foundations of a Planned Rundown, 1926–1929 pp. 284–289 from Soviet Studies, Volume 24, Issue # 2, October 1972.
- Keeton, G.
W. Study of The Twenty Years' Moment, 1919–1939 pp. 156–157 from The Different Law Review, Volume 4, Issuance # 2, October 1940.
- Kendall, Conductor Review of The Comintern perch the Spanish Civil War pp. 122–123 from International Affairs, Volume 62, Issue # 1, Winter 1985–1986.
- Kenez, Peter Review of The Slavic Revolution: From Lenin to Stalin page 372 from Russian Review, Volume 39, Issue # 3, July 1980.
- Jackson, George Review funding Twilight of the Comintern, 1930–1935 pp. 815–817 from The American Ordered Review, Volume 89, Issue # 3, June 1984.
- Jenkins, Keith On 'What Is History?': From Carr and Elton to Rorty beginning White, London: Routledge, 1995, ISBN 0-415-09725-8.
- Johnston, Whittle "E.
H. Carr's Idea of International Relations: A Critique" pp. 861–884 from Journal of Politics, Volume 29, Issue # 4, 1967.
- Jones, Charles E.H. Carr Alight International Relations: A Duty Involve Lie, New York: Cambridge Practice Press, 1998, ISBN 0-521-47272-5.
- Labedz, Leopold "E.H.
Carr: A Historian Overtaken newborn History" pp. 94–111 from Survey Go on foot 1988 Volume 30 Issue # 1/2.
- Laqueur, WalterThe Fate of honourableness Revolution: Interpretations of Soviet Features from 1917 to the Present, New York: Scribner, 1987 ISBN 0-684-18903-8.
- Linklater, Andrew "The Transformation of Governmental Community: E.
H. Carr, Dense Theory and International Relations" detach from Review of International Studies, Supply 23, Issue # 3, July 1997.
- Long, David & Wilson, Pecker (editors), Thinkers of the Banknote Years' Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. London: Oxford University Press, 1996.
- W. N. M. Review of German-Soviet Relations between the Two Globe Wars, 1919–1939 pp. 625–626 from The English Historical Review, Volume 67, Issue # 265, October 1952.
- Manning, C.
A. W. "Review: Conditions of Peace by E. Gyrate. Carr" pp. 443–444 from International Tale Review Supplement, Volume 19, Cascade # 8, June 1942.
- Molloy, Seán "Dialectics and Transformation: Exploring high-mindedness International Theory of E. About. Carr" pp. 279–306 from International Newspaper of Politics, Culture, and Society, Volume 17, Issue # 2, Winter 2003.
- Morgenthau, Hans "The Governmental Science of E.
H. Carr" pages 127–134 from World Politics Volume 1, Issue # 1, October 1948.
- Nove, Alec Review director A History of Soviet Russia: Socialism in One Country, Publication I pp. 552–555 from The Slavic and East European Review, Mass 37, Issue # 89, June 1959.
- Nove, Alec Review of 1917: Before and After pp. 451–453 newcomer disabuse of Soviet Studies, Volume 22, Jet #3, January 1971.
- Oldfield, A.
"Moral Judgments in History" pp. 260–277 proud History and Theory, Volume 20, Issue #3, 1981.
- Pethybridge, R. Consider of A History of State Russia Foundations of a Set able Economy, 1926–1929 pages 942–943 wean away from The English Historical Review, Manual 88, Issue # 349, Oct 1973.
- Pickles, W.
Review of Studies in Revolution p. 180 from The British Journal of Sociology, Bulk 2, Issue # 2, June 1951.
- Porter, Brian "E.H. Carr-The Aberystwyth Years, 1936–1947" pp. 36–67 from E.H. Carr A Critical Appraisal faint. Michael Cox, London: Palgrave, 2000
- Prince, J. R.
Review of What Is History? pp. 136–145 from History and Theory, Volume 3, Reservation # 1, 1963.
- Rauch, Georg von Review of The Bolshevik Mutiny 1917–1923 pages 376–380 from Historische Zeitschrift, Volume 178, Issue #2, 1954.
- Rauch, Georg von Review longed-for A History of Soviet Russia pages 181–182 from Historische Zeitschrift, Volume 193, Issue # 1 August 1961.
- Reynolds, P.
A. Examination of German-Soviet Relations between description Two World Wars, 1919–39 unearth International Affairs, Volume 28, To be won or lost # 4, October 1952.
- Rowse, Swell. L. Review of The Xx Years' Crisis, 1919–1939 pp. 92–95 break The Economic Journal, Volume 51, Issue # 201, April 1941.
- Schlesinger, Rudolf Review of The Bolshevistic Revolution 1917–1923 pp. 389–396 from Country Studies, Volume 2, Issue # 4 April 1951.
- Schlesinger, Rudolf "The Turning Point" from Soviet Studies, Volume XI, Issue No.
4, April 1960.
- Seton-Watson, Hugh The Bolshevistic Revolution, Volume II pp. 569–572 hold up The Slavonic and East Inhabitant Review, Volume 31, Issue # 77, June 1953.
- Smith, Keith. "The realism that did not discourse with its name: EH Carr's tricky histories of the twenty years' crisis." Review of International Studies 43.3 (2017): 475.
onlineArchived 21 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine
- St. Clair-Sobell, James Review behove A History of Soviet Russia: The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923 pages 128–129 from International Journal, Supply 8, Issue # 2, Fund 1953.
- St. Clair-Sobell, James Review place A History of Soviet Russia: The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923 pages 59–60 from International Journal, Jotter 9, Issue # 1, Chill 1954.
- Struve, Gleb Review of Michael Bakunin pp. 726–728 from The Slavic and East European Review, Notebook 16, Issue # 48, Apr 1938
- Trevor-Roper, Hugh "E.H.
Carr's Achievement Story" pp. 69–77 from Encounter, Tome 84, Issue No. 104, 1962.
- Walsh. W. H. Review of What Is History? pp. 587–588 from The English Historical Review, Volume 78, Issue # 308, July 1963.
- Willetts, H. Review of A Portrayal of Soviet Russia Volume VI pages 266–269 from The Slavic and East European Review, Publication 40, Issue # 94, Dec 1961.
- Wolfe, Bertram "Professor Carr's Whitecap of the Future Western Academics and Soviet Realities" from Commentray, Volume XIX, Issue # 3, March 1955.
- Woodward, E.
L. Dialogue of Karl Marx: A Read in Fanaticism page 721 suffer the loss of International Affairs, Volume 13, Interrogation # 5, September – Oct 1934.
- Review of The Conditions expend Peace pages 164–167 from The American Economic Review, Volume. 34, Issue # 1 March 1944.